Medical disclaimer: GlucoseForge is for informational purposes only. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.
CGM Accuracy

Published CGM Accuracy Figures 2026: How They Compare

MARD — Mean Absolute Relative Difference — is the standard accuracy metric for CGM devices. A lower MARD means a smaller average difference from the reference in that study. This page lists published pivotal trial figures for the CGMs available in the US in 2026; because protocols differ, the order is for reference and is not a clinical ranking.

GlucoseForge may earn a commission from links on this page. See our Affiliate Disclosure.
⚠️

Medical Disclaimer: This content is for informational purposes only. Always consult your healthcare provider before making health decisions.

Published MARD figures 2026

This comparison quotes study figures for specifically named sensor models. Do not transfer a figure from the original Libre 3 to a Plus variant or to another sensor; consult current manufacturer documentation for the model you will use.

Published CGM study figures — listed devices

A range and a pooled average are different summaries. Read how each study defines and reports its results; neither summary establishes a clinical ranking across separate protocols.

DeviceMARDRx requiredMonthly costSource
Dexcom G7 15 Day8.0%YesCheck priceDexcom pivotal trial (2025)
FreeStyle Libre 37.8%YesCheck priceAbbott pivotal trial (Alva et al., Diabetes Ther 2023; ages 6+)
FreeStyle Libre 3 Plus8.2% adults / ages 6–17 (manufacturer, YSI); 9.7% ages 2–5 (BGM)YesCheck priceAbbott US formulary kit, September 2025, page 5
Dexcom G7 (10 Day)8.2% adult armYesCheck priceDexcom pivotal trial
Medtronic Guardian 410.6% adult arm / 11.6% ages 7–17 armYesVariesFDA P160017/S091, table 17
Eversense 3658.8%Yes + procedureVariesENHANCE study (Bailey et al. 2025)
Eversense E38.7% (US IFU, SW605)Yes + procedureVariesUS E3 IFU SW605; 12,154 pairs
Dexcom Stelo7.3–9.1% (historical adults, by wear period)No (OTC)Check priceDexcom pivotal trial
Abbott Lingo8.1–10.7% (range, by glucose range)No (OTC)Check priceFDA K233655, six selected Libre 2 bins, 55–200 mg/dL

What is MARD and why does it matter?

MARD is the mean absolute relative difference between sensor readings and reference measurements in a particular study. It is an average across paired readings, not an error bound for each reading or a direct clinical ranking across separate studies.

A lower MARD means a smaller average difference in that study. MARD depends on the study protocol, the reference method, the glucose range and the number of paired readings, so a 7.9% figure from one study and an 8.7% figure from another do not show that one device reads closer to the true value. A small difference between separate studies is not by itself a clinical advantage.

Important caveats about MARD comparisons

Different trial populations and reporting methods: Abbott Lingo's FDA submission reports an 8.1–10.7% MARD range (by glucose range), based on the same pivotal sensor data as the Libre 2 platform, studied in people with diabetes; FreeStyle Libre 3's 7.8% single-figure MARD comes from its own pivotal trial, also in people with diabetes. A range and a single average are not directly comparable, and neither is directly comparable to Dexcom's figures, which come from separate trials with their own populations and methods.

Accuracy can vary with the glucose range and the study conditions. An overall MARD figure does not establish performance for an individual low-glucose reading or clinical superiority over another device.

Real-world vs clinical: MARD from pivotal trials may differ from real-world performance due to sensor placement, activity, temperature, and individual variation.

See full accuracy data for all devices

MARD, sensor life, cost, and clinical notes — all in one place.

Full accuracy comparison →

Device features and intended uses

OTC CGM (no prescription)

Published MARD figures come from separate manufacturer studies and do not establish which device is more accurate. Choose a device based on its intended use and the features you need with advice from your healthcare professional, and check manufacturers for current prices.

Prescription device example

FreeStyle Libre 3 (7.8% MARD) — available with a prescription; price depends on your plan or pharmacy. Reads every minute, lasts 14 days.

Check compatibility with your AID system

Published MARD figures come from separate manufacturer studies and do not establish which device is more accurate. Choose a device based on its intended use and the features you need with advice from your healthcare professional, and check manufacturers for current prices.

Frequently asked questions

How should published CGM accuracy figures be interpreted?
This comparison quotes study figures for specifically named sensor models. Do not transfer a figure from the original Libre 3 to a Plus variant or to another sensor; consult current manufacturer documentation for the model you will use.
How is CGM accuracy measured?
MARD is an average of absolute relative differences between sensor and reference readings within a study. A lower value describes a smaller average difference in that study; separate study values do not establish a clinical device ranking.
Is Dexcom or FreeStyle Libre more accurate?
This comparison quotes study figures for specifically named sensor models. Do not transfer a figure from the original Libre 3 to a Plus variant or to another sensor; consult current manufacturer documentation for the model you will use.
Does a more accurate CGM mean better diabetes management?
Accuracy is one factor among many. AID system compatibility, sensor life, data sharing features, cost, and insurance coverage all affect real-world outcomes. Dexcom G7 offers model-specific AID and watch features; the presence of a feature alone does not establish a clinical benefit for an individual. Always consult your healthcare provider when selecting a CGM for diabetes management.
What does 7.9% MARD mean in practice?
A MARD of 7.9% is an average, not a per-reading guarantee: across all the paired readings in a clinical validation study, the CGM's readings differed from the reference blood glucose value by 7.9% on average. It does not mean every individual reading falls within 7.9% — some readings in the same study will be closer to the reference value and some will be farther off; MARD only describes the average across the whole dataset, not a bound on any single reading.
Calculate exact costs for your monitoring period

Enter your own prices to compare calculated cost for your period.

CGM Cost Calculator →

Compare all CGM devices

Accuracy, cost, sensor life, and what each device is cleared for — in one comparison.

Compare all CGM devices →

Medical source review, 25 October 2026. Sources apply to their named models, populations and endpoints: Stelo FDA K260935; Original Libre 3, Alva 2023; Libre 3 Plus manufacturer kit, page 5; Guardian 4 FDA, table 17; Eversense E3 US IFU; Eversense 365 ENHANCE; Eversense 365 US guide; Eversense 365 and twiist.